NEW YORK (AP) 鈥 Donald Trump鈥檚 company impeded a grand jury investigation last year by repeatedly failing to turn over evidence in a timely fashion, leading to a secret contempt finding and a $4,000 fine, according to court records made public Tuesday.
The Trump Organization was found to have been 鈥渨illfully disobeying鈥 four grand jury subpoenas and three court orders, to the detriment of Manhattan prosecutors who were left ill-prepared to question witnesses, Judge Juan Manuel Merchan ruled.
The subpoenas, issued in March, April, May and June 2021, preceded the Trump Organization鈥檚 July 2021 indictment on criminal tax fraud charges for helping executives avoid taxes on company-paid perks. The and faces a fine of up to $1.6 million.
The $4,000 contempt fine was the maximum allowable by law.
It's yet another kerfuffle involving Trump and allegations of mishandling or withholding records. In April, a judge held Trump in contempt and for being slow to respond to a civil subpoena issued by New York鈥檚 attorney general. The former president has also been in Florida.
Merchan vaguely referenced the Trump Organization's contempt proceeding while presiding over the company's criminal trial, saying he would wait until after it was over to unseal records related to an unspecified proceeding held last year.
That proceeding turned out to be the Trump Organization鈥檚 closed-door contempt trial on Oct. 7, 2021 and Merchan鈥檚 partially redacted 28-page ruling finding the company in contempt, which he issued on Dec. 8, 2021.
While the company's name was blacked out in the court record released Tuesday, the details in the decision and the manner in which it was unsealed by the judge made it clear who was involved.
Manhattan prosecutors, frustrated with the company鈥檚 lack of compliance, had sought "coercive sanctions鈥 of $60,000 per day, Merchan said.
Trump Organization lawyers argued that the company had been providing a steady stream of records, at one point totaling more than 3.5 million pages of records, but Merchan said that was 鈥渏ust enough to fend off鈥 the prosecution鈥檚 request for penalties 鈥渨hile never fully meeting any of the deadlines.鈥
鈥淲hen challenged (the company) provided one excuse after another," Merchan wrote. 鈥淎t times it claimed it was impossible to meet deadlines because the demands were too voluminous, overbroad or vague. On other occasions, it blamed delays and omissions on human error鈥 or technical issues.
In the recently concluded criminal tax fraud trial, two corporate entities at the Trump Organization were convicted Dec. 6 of charges including charges of conspiracy and falsifying business records. Sentencing is scheduled for Jan. 13. The defense said it will appeal. Trump himself was not on trial.
The company鈥檚 former finance chief, to charges that he manipulated the company鈥檚 books to illegally reduce his taxes on $1.7 million in fringe benefits such as a Manhattan apartment and luxury cars. He testified in exchange for a promised five-month jail sentence.
___
Follow Michael Sisak on Twitter at and send confidential tips by visiting .
