Republicans are challenging extended mail ballot deadlines in at least two states in a legal maneuver that could have widespread implications for mail voting before the presidential election in November.
A lawsuit filed last week in Mississippi follows a similar one last year in North Dakota, both brought in heavily Republican states before conservative federal courts. Democratic and voting rights groups are concerned about the potential impact beyond those two states if a judge rules that deadlines for receiving mailed ballots that stretch past Election Day, Nov. 5, violate federal law.
They say it's possible such a decision would lead to a nationwide injunction similar to one last year when a Texas judge the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the abortion pill mifepristone.
鈥淭his effort risks disenfranchising Mississippi voters, but we don鈥檛 want that to also be precedent for other states,鈥 Abhi Rahman, communications director of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, said in response to the most recent lawsuit.
Mississippi and North Dakota are among several states that accept late-arriving mailed ballots as long as the ballots are postmarked on or before Election Day, That includes political swing states such as Nevada. Some states, including Colorado, Oregon and Utah, rely heavily on mail voting.
Former President Donald Trump has the use of mail voting, in particular when many states during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, when the Republican to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump has that after Election Day are an indication of widespread fraud. In the wake of his loss, several Republican-controlled states around mail voting.
The Republican 春色直播 Committee, the Mississippi Republican Party, a member of the state Republican Executive Committee and an election commissioner in one county filed on Friday against Secretary of State Michael Watson and six local election officials.
challenges a Mississippi law that says absentee ballots in presidential elections will be counted if they are postmarked by Election Day and received within five days. It argues that Mississippi improperly extends the federal election beyond the election date set by Congress and that, as a result, 鈥渢imely, valid ballots are diluted by untimely, invalid ballots.鈥
鈥淔ederal law is very clear 鈥- Election Day is the Tuesday after the first Monday in November,鈥 RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. 鈥淗owever, some states accept and count ballots days and days after Election Day, and we believe that practice is wrong.鈥
RNC spokesperson Gates McGavick said the group hopes for a ruling before the presidential election that state deadlines allowing ballots to be received after Election Day violate federal law.
鈥淭his case could have major ramifications in future elections 鈥 not just in Mississippi but across the country,鈥 he said.
The Democratic 春色直播 Committee said it is watching the cases closely and will fight any attempt to disenfranchise voters.
鈥淒emocrats will always stand on the side of voters against unlawful attacks on Americans鈥 fundamental right to make their voices heard at the ballot box," DNC deputy press secretary Nina Raneses said in a statement.
Democratic state Rep. Bryant Clark called the Mississippi lawsuit 鈥渁nother effort to try to stifle votes and stop the votes of a certain segment of the population.鈥 He said the suit may also lead to similar efforts across the country.
Thessalia Merivaki, a political science professor at Mississippi State University, said the state's mail voting process is already difficult to navigate and that eliminating the five-day window would 鈥渦nfairly punish鈥 voters.
In North Dakota, against the state election director was filed by the conservative Public Interest Legal Foundation on behalf of a county auditor, Mark Splonskowski, who cited what he said is a conflict between state and federal law. A court is expected to decide soon whether he has the legal right to bring the lawsuit.
Foundation spokesperson Lauren Bowman said while the lawsuit deals with North Dakota's law, a ruling that finds extended ballot deadlines violate federal law would affect other states with similar policies.
State Election Director Erika White has asked the case to be dismissed. Her attorneys characterized the county auditor's lawsuit as 鈥渁 bid to overthrow longstanding North Dakota law and rewrite it according to his own preference.鈥 Attorneys with the U.S. Justice Department鈥檚 Civil Rights Division filed a statement of interest in the case defending the existing state law, saying it was consistent with federal law and ensures that military and overseas ballots would be counted.
North Dakota Republican Secretary of State Michael Howe declined to comment, citing the pending litigation.
Republican state Sen. Kristin Roers said the lawsuit could have unintended consequences, such as for military voters, and would effectively penalize voters who live in areas with slow postal service.
鈥淚 don鈥檛 see that this is something that is a huge, glaring issue in our election system,鈥 she said.
Richard L. Hasen, a University of California, Los Angeles law professor and election law expert, criticized the legal basis of the lawsuits. In the Mississippi case, he said the RNC appears to be trying to gain a political advantage because it 鈥渂elieves late-arriving mail ballots are more likely to favor Democrats.鈥
He noted that the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which includes Mississippi, has historically been quite conservative 鈥渁nd not protective of voting rights.鈥
鈥淚t would be a far reach for a challenge to Mississippi law to lead to a national injunction against this,鈥 he said. 鈥淏ut it鈥檚 possible.鈥
___
Fernando reported from Chicago, Pettus from Jackson, Mississippi, and Dura from Bismarck, North Dakota.
___
The Associated Press鈥痳eceives support from several private foundations to enhance its explanatory coverage of elections and democracy. See more about AP鈥檚 democracy initiative . The AP is solely responsible for all content.
