*´ºÉ«Ö±²¥

The messaging overlap was no surprise.

Orbán's strongman style has long served as an , who have looked at as with less immigration, fewer regulations and the removal of democratic constraints they see as unwieldy or inconvenient.

Orbán has formed a close bond with Trump and has made to the president’s Florida resort. This week, the prime minister Trump's unilateral outreach to Russian President Vladimir Putin over the war in Ukraine. During one of last year’s U.S. presidential debates, Trump praised Orbán as “a strong man. He’s a tough person.�

Now, with Trump back since Jan. 20, he is of in a way that is drawing comparisons to the employed by Orbán and other autocrats.

Orbán used state power to crush rivals, remake the judiciary and game elections to make it much harder to oust his party. He has cracked down on , immigration, the media and civic organizations.

Although the two men and political systems are different, there are striking parallels between what Orbán has achieved in Hungary and and for his second term.

A blueprint for returning to office

After becoming prime minister in 1998, Orbán suffered an unexpected electoral defeat four years later. He then swore he “would never lose again� and began planning the political transformation of Hungary, said Kim Lane Scheppele, a Princeton professor who worked at Hungary’s Constitutional Court in the 1990s.

While he was out of power, Orbán and his allies created a legal framework to consolidate authority. It was swiftly implemented after Orbán’s Fidesz party swept to victory with a two-thirds majority in 2010.

“It wasn’t called Project 2025,� Scheppele added, referring to the for Trump's second term that has been in many of the president's early actions. “It might have been called Project 2010.�

The European Parliament has declared Orban's Hungary an

Upon returning to office with a Republican majority in Congress, Trump issued seeking to expand the power of the presidency and of checks and balances. He has continued to make changes to the government .

The American Bar Association issued warning that many of the Trump administration's actions are “contrary to the rule of law.�

Remaking the legal system

The most consequential of Fidesz’s early actions was .

In 2012, Orbán’s government lowered the mandatory judicial retirement age, resulting in the termination of nearly 300 senior judges. Responsibility for filling the positions was vested in a single political appointee — the spouse of a Fidesz founder.

“It took three years and it was all over,� Scheppele said. “As long as he had the highest court in his pocket, he could get away with a lot.�

While Trump and Republicans cannot unilaterally change the face of the judiciary, the parallels with Orbán are clear. Republicans have long sought a conservative judiciary, and Trump embraced that priority when he first became president in 2017.

In his first term, Trump nominated three of the U.S. Supreme Court's current nine members, giving conservatives a supermajority that last year from criminal prosecution for his attempts to overturn .

Trump has moved to remake the U.S. Department of Justice after having about using it to go after his critics and those who . He has who investigated the on the U.S. Capitol and the FBI.

His administration has who have some of its actions, with some in power even suggesting at one point that .

Still, Trump's power over the judicial branch is not absolute. Many Trump-appointed judges showed independence in 2020, his lawsuits to overturn his to Democrat Joe Biden.

The U.S. court system also is larger than Hungary's and full of judges appointed by previous presidents, including Biden.

Consolidating political power

Orbán’s first moves after regaining power were rewriting Hungary’s constitution and overhauling election laws in a way that ensured his party would have a greater proportion of its own lawmakers in the legislature.

Due partly to those changes, Orbán’s party has won a two-thirds majority in every election since 2010 while receiving as little as 44% of the vote. In Hungary, parties, rather than voters, select candidates for seats in parliament — a system that gives Orbán tremendous power in shaping the government.

“He decides who can be a politician and who cannot be a politician," said Zsuzsanna Szelényi, a founding Fidesz member who left the party in 1994. "He completely owns the party.�

Orbán has defined his party as embodying true Hungarian identity while and . It's similar to Trump, who has against .

There also are parallels in dealing with the media. Orban his country’s independent media as deep-pocketed allies who benefited from generous state contracts influential news outlets. Trump, too, has put pressure on the media in the United States through and .

While Trump does not control party elections in the same way Orbán does, he has , making loyalty to him its organizing principle. He has in nominations for top government jobs, including the leadership of the U.S. , and U.S. .

Trump also is pushing to change rules so he and his allies can who they see as and potentially replace them with .

Cozying up to dictators

Orbán’s evolution into an autocrat occurred parallel to another transformation: his drift toward Russia, China and other autocracies.

Géza Jeszenszky, Hungary’s first foreign minister after the fall of state socialism, said Orbán recognized that the constraints of a Western democracy were incompatible with the sweeping changes he wanted. So he took examples from autocratic countries, specifically .

“His aim was to follow them,� Jeszenszky said.

Trump has a long history of speaking favorably about , especially — whom he once said he . He also had praised Putin's invasion of Ukraine as “brilliant" and has to Ukraine being an equal participant in negotiations with Russia to end the war.

Szelényi, the Fidesz founding member, said fundamental political and economic differences between Hungary and the U.S. would make it more difficult for such a comprehensive political capture to take place in the U.S.

Still, she said, Hungary's transformation under Orbán should serve as a warning.

“If autocratization starts, it goes on like a snowball,� she said. “It’s not something that stops — it’s a process.�

___

Riccardi reported from Denver.