*春色直播

The current eligibility thresholds are dependent on family size and income. A single person would have to make $22,720 or less to qualify for criminal and family duty counsel, a requirement that increases to up to $50,803 for families of five or more. 聽

The new plan proposes to increase the income threshold for those duty counsel services and criminal certificates to $45,440 for families of up to four people, for three years. The asset threshold for legal aid applicants would also increase to $15,000, regardless of family size.聽

Attorney General Doug Downey said the increase is expected to help an additional 180,000 people each year, particularly those most vulnerable while navigating the legal system.

鈥淚t鈥檚 an intimidating system, it鈥檚 got a different vocabulary, it鈥檚 complicated,鈥� Downey said in a video call. 鈥淭o have somebody help navigate you through that, by definition, makes it a good public service and makes the system function better.鈥澛�

Downey added that removing the family size stipulations for the income thresholds also aims to reduce red tape for those trying to access legal aid.聽

鈥淭his is a service to an individual, regardless of their circumstances,鈥� Downey said. 鈥淚t means duty counsel and legal aid itself can spend less time on administration, trying to figure out whether (they) have three kids or four kids or two kids.鈥� 聽

The changes would come into effect sometime after a public consultation period ends on Jan. 9, a spokesperson for the attorney general鈥檚 office said in a statement.聽

Boris Bytensky, president of the Criminal Lawyers鈥� Association, said he welcomes the changes. Under the current threshold, a single person working a full-time minimum wage job in Ontario wouldn鈥檛 qualify, he said, and an Ontarian would likely have to be on some form of social assistance to get legal aid.

鈥淚 think it's an outstanding first step that, frankly, is long overdue,鈥� Bytensky said in a phone interview.聽

When people make more money than the current threshold but still can鈥檛 afford a lawyer, they often end up representing themselves, explained Bytensky. That leads to court backlogs that could suspend 聽cases, he said.

The eligibility increase will 鈥渟ubstantially鈥� assist those who can鈥檛 afford legal services, and overall support criminal justice in the province, he said. 聽

But Bytensky emphasized there are still structural issues in the criminal law sector that must be addressed. Criminal defence lawyers have received compensation increases at rates lower than other law sectors over the past decade, he said, and the current system also limits the number of hours they can devote to legal aid clients.

鈥淭hey are not doing this primarily as a profit centre. They鈥檙e doing this well below their regular rates that they would charge to private-paying clients,鈥� he said, adding that he鈥檇 like to see criminal defence lawyers be 鈥渞easonably paid鈥� and given enough time to work on complex cases.聽

Lenny Abramowicz, chair of the Alliance for Sustainable Legal Aid, said he鈥檚 encouraged by Legal Aid Ontario's announcement, calling the current eligibility thresholds 鈥渕uch too low.鈥澛�

But Abramowicz said there鈥檚 still far more to be done when it comes to justice in the province. For starters, he said he鈥檇 like the eligibility expansion to become permanent to make the system more expeditious.聽

鈥淚t would allow for access to justice in the province, for people ... when they're facing criminal incarceration to be able to actually have representation,鈥� he said.聽

Abramowicz added that he鈥檇 also like to see the financial eligibility increase cover civil matters, since many Ontarians also need legal aid in social assistance or housing cases.

When they can't access legal help for civil matters, they often end up losing their cases or giving up, he said.

鈥淭he vast majority of Ontarians never appear in a criminal court outside of maybe a parking ticket or traffic ticket,鈥� he said. 鈥淗owever, the vast majority of Ontarians do have family law issues, do have landlord and tenant issues, do have social benefit issues, so representation in those matters are equally important."

鈥淭he government needs to use the same approach it has taken towards dealing with the backlogs and the problems in the criminal court system with respect to civil law matters.鈥澛�

For Bytensky, the newly proposed eligibility threshold is significant but only the start of what鈥檚 needed to ensure everyone can have their day in court.聽

鈥淚t is an important step forward, but it can't be the last step forward.鈥澛�

This report by 春色直播was first published Jan. 6, 2025.